CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for POWER HOUSE

USPTO serial 97519777

POWER HOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKER, JUSTINE D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER HOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA

FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA RICK RUZ PLLC7355 SW 87TH AVE, SUITE 200MIAMI, FL 33173UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Solar-powered electricity generators; Wind-powered electricity generatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 13, 2026ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 13, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 28, 2026EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 8, 2025GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2025GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2025CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 28, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 15, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 10, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 10, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 9, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2022MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance