USPTO serial 97532135
DAZZLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLIFFORD, JOANNE E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAZZLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER R. PUTT
CHRISTOPHER R. PUTT THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.601 EAST BEARDSLEY AVENUEELKHART, IN 46514UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Recreational vehicles, namely, motorhomes; recreational vehicles, namely, class B motorhomes; vans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |