USPTO serial 97533072
CENTRICITY CX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHACHT-LEVINE, JORDANA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 304- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CENTRICITY CX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James David Johnson
JAMES DAVID JOHNSON JOHNSON & MARTIN, P.A.500 WEST CYPRESS CREEK ROADSUITE 430FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Customer services, namely, responding to customers inquiries relating to software and cloud computing solutions; business assistance services, namely, assisting customers with inquiries relating to software and cloud computing solutions; advice and information about customer services and product management related to software and cloud computing solutions; providing business information relating to software and cloud computing solutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software, network, and other informational technology problems; information technology (IT) consulting services; non-downloadable software; software as a service (SaaS); software as a service (SaaS), namely, providing contact center services for customers; software as a service (SaaS), namely, customer experience and contact management services related to cloud software; software as a service (SaaS); software as a service (SaaS), namely, providing technical support and customer contact and experience services related to information technology (IT) and cloud software and computing; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for receiving and responding to customers inquiries relating to software and cloud computing solutions; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for assisting customers with inquiries relating to software and cloud computing solutions; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for providing advice and information to others about customer services and product management related to software and cloud computing solutions; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for providing technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software, network, and other informational technology problems; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for providing information technology (IT) consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |