CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for .ERTH

USPTO serial 97542782

.ERTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with .ERTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEVIN C PARKS

KEVIN C PARKS LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing a virtual and augmented reality web gaming hosting platform for discovery, navigation, and technical infrastructure for decentralized applications, games, ecommerce and graphical user experiencesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 12, 2024EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Sep 11, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 23, 2024GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2024GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2024CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2024EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 19, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 19, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 19, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 17, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 19, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 29, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance