USPTO serial 97542869
ONE FAMILY FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FREEMAN, BREANNA SHALEISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONE FAMILY FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Stone Rosenfield
Susan Stone Rosenfield FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.2394 EAST CAMELBACK ROADSUITE 600PHOENIX, AZ 85016-3429Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared foods, namely, soups, chilis in the nature of chili con carne and vegetarian chili, stews in the nature of beef stew and chicken stew, snack food dips, pie fillings in the nature of fruit-based filling for pies; meats and processed foods, namely, canned, bottled, pickled, frozen and dried fruits and vegetables, prepared meats, preserved meats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared foods, namely, cheese sauces, gravy sauces, meat sauces, pasta sauces, tomato sauces, sauce mixes, salad dressings, pie fillings in the nature of custard and chocolate-based pie fillings and meat-based fillings for meat pies | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture for others of prepared foods, namely, soups, cheese sauces, gravy sauces, meat sauces, pasta sauces, tomato sauces, sauce mixes, chilis, namely, chili con carne, vegetarian chili, stews, namely, beef stew, chicken stew, salad dressings, snack food dips, pie fillings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |