USPTO serial 97544585
TIDAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIDAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Go Deep International (N.B.) Inc.
St John, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn E. Garipay
Kathryn E. Garipay OLSON & CEPURITIS, LTD.20 NORTH WACKER DRIVE36TH FLOORCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Anchors; mooring chains of metal; shackles and bolts made of metal; oyster cages made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Navigational buoys | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Oyster cages not made of metal for commercial use; non-metal aquaculture buoys; non-metal oyster bags in the nature of mesh bags; non-metal oyster cage buoys; buoys for non-metal oyster bags; non-metal oyster cage buoys; non-metal lobster trap buoys | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Anchoring ropes; mussel socking in the nature of mesh tubes; scallop nets in the nature of commercial nets; oyster nets in the nature of commercial nets; oyster bags in the nature of mesh bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Go Deep International (N.B.) Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named TIDAL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |