USPTO serial 97550918
UPCYCLED SIMPLY GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERTRAND, JOSEPH A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UPCYCLED SIMPLY GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan G. Towner
Alan G. Towner LEECH TISHMAN FUSCALDO & LAMPL525 WILLIAM PENN PLACE, 28TH FLOORPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal storage baskets for general use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Storage baskets for household purposes; Baskets for household use; Laundry hampers for domestic or household use; laundry baskets; laundry baskets with textile liners | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Window curtains; shower curtains; towels; bed sheets; bed blankets; bedspreads; duvet covers; comforters; mattress covers; pillow protectors being pillow covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bath robes | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Bath mats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Decolin Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named UPCYCLED SIMPLY GREEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |