USPTO serial 97552056
ZYGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 794
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBIN, DAVID I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZYGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Middlefield, CT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA JOHNSON WALDEN
CYNTHIA JOHNSON WALDEN FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical and electro-optical measuring devices and components thereof, namely, optical gauges for use and measurements in metrology, namely, contour gauges, depth gauges, gauges for measuring angles, gauges for measuring dimensions, gauges for measuring shapes, thickness measuring for measuring the thickness of coatings, and length measuring gauges, prisms, precision optical flat being optical inspection apparatus, Scientific and technical apparatus mirrors, namely, optical mirrors and extreme ultraviolet optical mirrors, beam splitters being optical inspection apparatus, precision optical window being optical inspection apparatus, retroflectors, namely, optical reflectors being optical devices that reflect beams back to its source, optical retroreflectors being optical reflectors, beam expanders, namely, laser beam expanders and light beam expanders not for medical use, optical components for use with laser amplifiers being structural parts specially adapted for lasers not for medical use, lasers, not for medical purposes, lasers not for medical use for industrial purposes, laser tubes specially adapted for lasers not for medical use, slab laser amplifier being structural parts specially adapted for lasers not for medical use, optical lenses, transmission spheres, namely, optical devices for use in metrology being optical inspection apparatus, optical transmission prisms, optical reference prisms, attenuation filters, namely, filters for optical devices for use in optical measurements, optical mirror mounts specially adapted for scientific and technical apparatus, namely, optical mirrors, stage positioning systems comprised of optical sensors being displacement position sensors, nano position sensors being optical sensors, displacement measuring interferometers and lasers not for medical use, optical encoders, optical diffraction gratings being optical inspection apparatus, and optical-mechanical assemblies being apparatus for integration of optical components into mechanical structures; interferometers; optical profilers; metrology systems and structural parts therefor, namely, optical apparatus for measurement; downloadable software for measurement data acquisition and analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering design services; Product development; Engineering design and engineering services in the field of metrology and optics; Metrology and optics applications development, namely, metrology services and optical research laboratory services being development and implementation of metrology and optical solutions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |