USPTO serial 97555203
VEGETOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEGETOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANICE HOUSEY
Janice Housey LITMUS LAW PLLC4 Weems La #240Winchester, VA 22601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | anti-aging cosmetic preparations, namely, anti-aging cream, anti-aging cleanser, anti-aging moisturizer, anti-aging serum, anti-aging essences, anti-aging ampoules; make-up; cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; beauty soap; shampoos; cosmetic preparations for skin care; toothpaste; perfumes and toilet waters; mask pack for cosmetic purposes; make-up preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale store services featuring cosmetics; Retail store services featuring cosmetics; Consulting in advertising, marketing and public relations communication strategies; Advertising agency services; Administration of the business affairs of franchises; Business management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |