USPTO serial 97560193
LUO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBIN, DAVID I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Madeleine Vera Wykstra
167 LIPPINCOTT ROADWALLKILL, NY 12589UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Operating on-line marketplaces for sellers and buyers of goods and/or services; Providing legal docket management services for others; Providing a website featuring an online marketplace for exchanging goods and services with other users; Providing industry information relating to the litigation finance industry; Provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal advisory services in the field of access to justice and litigating finance/funding; Legal aid services in the nature of providing legal assistance for those unable to afford an attorney; Legal consultation services; Legal consulting services in the field of access to justice and litigating finance/funding; Legal information services; Legal information services in the field of cryptocurrency; Legal information services in the field of access to justice and litigating finance/funding; Legal services; Legal services, namely, providing customized legal information, counseling, advice, and litigation services in all areas of law to people and families of modest incomes; Legal services, namely, providing customized documentation, information, counseling, advice and consultation services in all areas of access to justice and litigating finance/funding; Legal support services; Providing legal information in the field of cryptocurrency; Providing legal information via a website; Providing legal research in the field of access to justice and litigation finance; Providing legal services by means of consumers sending a text message to a lawyer via cell phones; Providing an on-line interactive database featuring legal information; Providing customized legal information, counseling, and advice, and litigation services in the field of litigation finance; Providing customized legal information, counseling, and advice, and litigation services in the field of access to justice; Providing information about legal services via a website; Providing information in the field of workplace law, legal practices and legal policies via the Internet; Providing information relating to legal affairs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |