Drawing for EYECAR

USPTO serial 97568426

EYECAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EYECAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danielle Byford

Danielle Byford THE BYFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC16165 North 83rd Avenue Suite 200Peoria, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of enhancing the user experience with physical items; Downloadable augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of saving and augmenting videos and photos displaying interactive visual and audiovisual content, and creating immersive content; Downloadable augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of 3d model visualization; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for enhancing the user experience with physical items; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for saving and augmenting videos and photos displaying interactive visual and audiovisual content, and creating immersive content; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for 3d model visualization; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of enhancing the user experience with physical items; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for saving and augmenting videos and photos, displaying interactive visual and audiovisual content, and creating immersive content; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for 3d model visualizationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance