USPTO serial 97570773
ULTRA MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATTANG, UDEME U
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRA MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Anna McCoy
B. Anna McCoy MCCOY RUSSELL LLP1410 NW JOHNSON STREETSUITE 201PORTLAND, OR 97209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Conveyors being machines for food processing and food preparation; vibratory conveyors for food processing and food preparation; conveying machinery and apparatus, namely, vibratory, motion, belt, and mechanical conveyors for food processing and food preparation; assembly line conveyor machinery for food processing and food preparation; material handling equipment, namely, bucket elevators, belt conveyors, tote dumpers, spiral let-down chutes, chip sizers for separating large from small food chips to maximize packaging efficiencies, disc graders for separating and sorting irregular sized pieces of food products from ideal sized pieces, and cluster busters for breaking down product clumps; material handling machinery, namely, bucket elevators, belt conveyors, tote dumpers, spiral let- down chutes, chip sizers for separating large from small food chips to maximize packaging efficiencies, disc graders for separating and sorting irregular sized pieces of food products from ideal sized pieces, and cluster busters for breaking down product clumps; equipment in the nature of coating machine drums and tanks for food processing and food preparation and machines for seasoning and coating food; liquid application oils and slurrys food-preparing equipment for seasoning and coating, namely, systems comprised of spin coating machine drums, belt conveyors, dispensers being food applicators, applicators being powder and liquid application, slurry applications, and tanks being metal storage tanks; equipment in the nature of oil fryers and machines for frying food; equipment in the nature of oil fryers and rotary fryers and machines for frying food; food-preparing equipment for frying foods, namely, linear and rotary frying systems comprised of belts, conveyors, fryers, and controls; parts, fittings and accessories for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |