USPTO serial 97571673
STANDARD H2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, CHRISTOPHER J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STANDARD H2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Doylestown, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William G Mitchell
William G Mitchell JUNEAU & MITCHELL6601 COVE POINT DRIVEWILMINGTON, NC 28409UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | hydrogen, namely, liquid hydrogen and hydrogen gas, not for use as fuel | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | hydrogen production apparatus and systems, namely, reactor chambers and filtration systems for harvesting hydrogen gas from hydrogen sulfide; industrial apparatus and systems for reacting hydrogen sulfide to produce hydrogen, namely, chemical reactor chambers; chemical reactors for industrial use, namely, for producing hydrogen | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | treatment of hydrogen sulfide; disposal of hydrogen sulfide, namely, hydrogen sulfide wate processing and hydrogen sulfide waste treatement services; processing hydrogen sulfide waste product for reuse and disposal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |