USPTO serial 97585545
HOLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett T. Cooke
Brett T. Cooke EUREKA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PLLC20507 TAMARRON DR.HUMBLE, TX 77346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for use as an electronic wallet for managing debit card accounts, wireless service account management, real time account balances, real time money movement, loading and offloading of funds, online bill payment, and funds transfer services; downloadable computer software for use as an electronic wallet for receiving and sending cryptocurrency, buying and selling cryptocurrency, and converting cryptocurrency between various cryptocurrencies or fiat currencies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, banking, credit card transaction processing services, debit card transaction processing services; payment verification services; credit and debit card authorization services; electronic funds transfer; payment transaction authentication, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options and debt settlement services; value exchange services, namely, secure electronic cash transactions over computer networks to facilitate electronic commerce; Provision of financial information in the nature of electronic payment data via a global computer network or via telecommunication, mobile or wireless devices; financial consulting services in the fields of payment solutions, banking, credit cards, debit cards, and payment cards; providing financial information in the metaverse and other virtual worlds; charitable fundraising services in the metaverse and other virtual worlds; financial sponsorship of cultural events, charitable events, concerts, sporting events, travel experiences, fine dining events, festivals and awards shows in the metaverse and other virtual worlds; clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network; providing banking services, and providing financial services, namely, credit card authorization, factoring, payment processing, and transaction processing; electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; and underwriting and administration of insurance for financial transactions conducted via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Original Digital Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Original Digital Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named HOLA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |