Drawing for MAGMO

USPTO serial 97588689

MAGMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, JAYLEN SYLVIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 132

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kwang Yup Chae

Kwang Yup Chae HAUPTMAN HAM, LLP2318 MILL ROADSUITE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Call recorder in the nature of digital voice recorders, audio recorders, and telephone recorders for use with and attachment to smartphones; Telephone recorders; Voice recording apparatus; Sound recording apparatus and instruments; Downloadable computer software to automate data warehousing; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, for use in recorded sound database management, and for use in replaying voice and sound recorded in electronic storage of dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 31, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 2, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 1, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 29, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 26, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 25, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 24, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 24, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance