Drawing for MIA

USPTO serial 97591458

MIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Casimir

David A. Casimir CASIMIR JONES, S.C.2275 DEMING WAY, SUITE 310MIDDLETON, WI 53562UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical navigation system comprised of an electromagnetic field generator and implantable marker used as a location indicator for use with minimally invasive video or robotic surgical assistance technologies in identifying and navigating to the location of an implantable marker within a patientACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Oct 27, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 28, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 22, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance