USPTO serial 97593599
COUNTERFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATTANG, UDEME U
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUNTERFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Elkhart, IN, US
Elkhart, IN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Ainsworth
Brian E. Ainsworth Price Heneveld LLP3400 Innovation Ct. SeP.O. Box 2567Grand Rapids, MI 49501-2567Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective fitted fabric covers for electronic warfare suites, being covers for radar detectors and radar jammers, on naval marine vessels; protective fitted fabric covers for radar jamming apparatus, on naval marine vessels; protective fitted fabric covers for radar controls for guns, on naval marine vessels | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Fitted fabric covers for vehicles, boats and marine vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Protective fitted fabric covers for decoy and chaff launchers, in the nature of covers for rocket launchers, on naval marine vessels | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Insulating unfitted fabric covers for military machinery and electrical equipment for electromagnetic shielding, protecting against elements, and corrosion protection | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Unfitted fabric covers for vehicles, boats and marine vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Unfitted fabric covers for military radios, antennas and computers; metal-coated fabrics, namely, woven and non-woven fabrics of natural and synthetic fibers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Transhield, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Transhield, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named COUNTERFORCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |