USPTO serial 97596847
SMART-LINQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART-LINQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darren M. Geliebter
Darren M. Geliebter LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP230 PARK AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR WESTNEW YORK, NY 10169United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud-based platform as a service featuring computer software platforms offering a complete solution for streamlining, managing, implementing and standardizing the request for quote and request for proposal process and workflow in the healthcare, health insurance, insurance, reinsurance, and prescription benefits industries, namely, receiving, managing, generating, and submitting requests for quotes and requests for proposals, managing quotes and proposals, CRM integration, managing and custom-building of documents generated, contract management and automation of the entire process, paperless solutions, e-signature and chat solutions; electronic signature verification services using technology to authenticate user identity; Cloud-based platform as a service featuring computer software for connecting business processes for quote proposal generation, request for proposals, and contracts; Cloud-based platform as a service featuring computer software for managing quotes and requests for proposals; Cloud- based platform as a service featuring computer software for managing and custom- building documents generated in the process of generating requests for proposals, all of the above excluding software for use in healthcare operations improvement for oncology practices, quality improvement for oncology practices, and clinical trial matching programs for oncology practices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |