Drawing for ATOMSTACK

USPTO serial 97609390

ATOMSTACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SULLIVAN, JOHN C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 133

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATOMSTACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Evelyn Ufomadu

Evelyn Ufomadu Brealant500 Westover Dr#15266Sanford, NC 27330

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
0073D printers; 3D printing pens; Computer controlled lathes; Engraving machines; Extrusion moulding machines; Glass-working machines; Industrial inkjet printing machines; Industrial robots; Injection moulding machines; Laser engraving machines; Laser machines for cutting, marking, and engraving fabric designed for installation directly above embroidery machines; Machine parts, namely, fluid drive couplings; Machine parts, namely, work holding fixtures for precision machining applications; Machines for plastics working; Milling machines; Numerically controlled machines and machine tools used for machining parts; Shaft couplings for machines; Stone working machines; Wood carving machinesACTIVEJun 22, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 9, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 9, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 8, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 7, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 30, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 25, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 28, 2024KSNSNOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW—
May 28, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 30, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2022MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance