USPTO serial 97611856
TIDAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIDAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MASSAPEQUA, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott E. Scioli
Scott E. Scioli PINNACLE IP STRATEGIES, LLCP.O. BOX 2498CINNAMINSON, NJ 08077UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment advisory and sub-advisory services in the fields of exchange-traded funds and mutual funds, exchange-traded fund and mutual fund analysis services, exchange-traded fund and mutual fund investment services, exchange-traded fund and mutual fund development services, exchange-traded fund and mutual fund planning services, exchange-traded fund and mutual fund distribution, exchange-traded fund and mutual fund capital investment, exchange-traded fund and mutual fund sales and marketing support services, establishing exchange-traded funds and mutual funds for others; providing consulting services, namely, financial and investment consulting for advisory services and in connection with registering, administering, and distributing exchange-traded funds and mutual funds and complying with applicable laws; financial sponsoring of exchange-traded funds and mutual funds, and investment advisory services to high net worth individuals, family offices, and institutions | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |