USPTO serial 97612690
QUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NISAN STEINBERG
Nisan Steinberg LAW OFFICES OF NISAN STEINBERG18135 BURBANK BLVD UNIT 12TARZANA, CA 91356UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Biosensor systems or platforms that include, as components therein, automated detectors and monitoring instruments, microfluidic devices, and housings, namely, biosensor systems that contain or comprise, or are designed to contain or comprise, in their operational state, microbial biosensor strains, for scientific research and monitoring of environmental waters and aqueous inputs and outputs of industrial processes; and computer hardware and online non-downloadable software integrated into such biosensor systems for controlling their operation, maintenance, and data acquisition and analysis; none of the aforesaid goods in the medical or healthcare sector save for pharmaceuticals; and excluding patch clamp apparatus and instruments for measuring and monitoring of chemical and biochemical processes in cell membranes and for handling, manipulating and characterising ion channels and transporters in living cells | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design, namely, of biosensor systems, platforms, assemblies, arrays, units, microfluidic devices and housings, and which, namely, contain or comprise, or are designed to contain or comprise in their operational state, microbial biosensor strains, for scientific research and monitoring of environmental waters and aqueous inputs and outputs of industrial processes; and design and development of computer hardware and software for integration into such biosensor systems for controlling their operation and maintenance, and their data acquisition and analysis; none of the aforesaid services in the medical or healthcare sector save for pharmaceuticals; and excluding the programming of apparatus and instruments for the measuring or monitoring of chemical and biochemical processes in cell membranes, and for the programming of apparatus or instruments for handling, manipulating and characterising ion channels and transporters in living cells | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | LOPE | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |