USPTO serial 97621293
EPROVIDERSYNC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPROVIDERSYNC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raj S. Davé
Raj S. Davé DAVE LAW GROUP LLC2000 DUKE STREET, SUITE 300,ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring a cloud based software for providing an end-to-end solution for provider data and contract lifecycle management for health insurance payers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring a cloud based software for providing an Internet website portal in the field of health insurance for managing data and automating provider enrollment; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring a cloud based software for automating credentialing, contracting, and directory management in the field of health insurance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring a cloud based software for streamlining health insurance provider analytics and reporting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |