USPTO serial 97621489
ORGANIZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRARY, LISA J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORGANIZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
Andrew D. Price VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones and tablet computers to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making; downloadable computer application software for mobile phones and handheld computers to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable computer software and online, non-downloadable computer software platforms all used to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making; providing a website featuring non-downloadable computer software and online, non-downloadable computer software platforms all used to evaluate, analyze and modify provided data to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, and for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making; data warehousing; data provision services, namely, data automation and collection, using proprietary software to evaluate and analyze provided data to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making, with the results of such evaluation and analysis provided via electronic spreadsheets; data automation services using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and modify provided data to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making, with the results of such evaluation and analysis provided via the Internet; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms to evaluate, analyze and modify provided data to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making, with the results of such evaluation, analysis and modifications provided via the Internet; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software used to evaluate, analyze and modify provided data to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making, with the results of such evaluation, analysis and modifications provided via the Internet; platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring software used to evaluate, analyze and modify voter data in a geospatial visualization environment over maps to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making, with the results of such evaluation, analysis and modifications provided via the Internet; and software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software used to evaluate, analyze and modify voter data in a geospatial visualization environment over maps to facilitate canvassing and field work for organizations and volunteers, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making, with the results of such evaluation, analysis and modifications provided via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |