Drawing for GREENBUS

USPTO serial 97625467

GREENBUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREENBUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Geller

Michael A. Geller DLA PIPER LLP (US)P.O Box 64807Chicago, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digitally operable automated building control systems comprised of lighting hardware, lighting controls, communications buses, and input/output devices that allow communications among lighting components, sensors, touch-screens, keypads, computer hardware and downloadable software used to monitor and control lighting, downloadable interface software for commissioning and managing lighting control systems, and for optimizing lighting strategies and energy efficiency; apparatus for controlling residential, commercial, and industrial lighting systems, namely, lighting controls and lighting sensors, switches, and occupancy sensors, namely, electronic devices which detect the presence of occupants and control lighting system accordingly; lighting hardware, namely, lighting controls; computer servers; communications and input/output devices in the nature of electronic display interfaces that allows communications among lighting components, sensors, and lighting controls; all of the foregoing goods may be used for increasing energy efficiency for benefit to the environmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 19, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 17, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 25, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance