Drawing for WELD

USPTO serial 97626065

WELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, LUCY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sebastian Meis

Sebastian Meis BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC3414 PEACHTREE ROAD NE, SUITE 1500ATLANTA, GA 30326UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for accessing content regarding welding and the welding industryACTIVEFeb 1, 2022
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing online and telecommunication facilities for interaction between and among users of computers, mobile and handheld computers, and wired and wireless communication devices; message sending and receiving services, namely, enabling individuals to send and receive messages via email or a website on the internet concerning welding and the welding industry; providing an online community forum for registered users and guests to share information, photos, audio and video content related to weldingACTIVEFeb 1, 2022
041Providing online journals in the nature of blogs, online nondownloadable educational materials in the nature of podcasts and presentations, and online non-downloadable how-to videos featuring content related to welding and the welding industry; providing educational courses on weldingACTIVEFeb 1, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 9, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 2, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 19, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 27, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 17, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance