USPTO serial 97627778
AUTORATION PRO MAESTRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTORATION PRO MAESTRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St-Germain-de-Grantham, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paras R. Shah
Paras R. Shah FLENER IP & BUSINESS LAW77 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 800CHICAGO, IL 60602United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automated feeding systems for dairy farms consisting primarily of agricultural feeding machines in the nature of silo unloaders, RTM transmitters, conveyors, feeding robots and bale choppers as well as electronic control panels, programmable logic control devices, scales, computer and communication interfaces with color touch screens, electronic limit swithces and electronic sensors required to control the aforementioned agricultural feeding machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Automated feeding systems for dairy farms consisting primarily of electronic control panels, programmable logical control devices, communication interfaces with color touch screens, electronic limit switches and all electronic sensors required to control agricultural feeding machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |