USPTO serial 97627792
BARN COMMANDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD,PARKER WALDRIP
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BARN COMMANDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St-Germain-de-Grantham, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paras R. Shah
Paras R. Shah FLENER IP & BUSINESS LAW77 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 800CHICAGO, IL 60602United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Manure management systems for dairy farms consisting primarily of manure management agricultural machines in the nature of alley scrapers, level probes, gutter cleaners, electric and hydraulic pumps, agitators and diverting valves, as well as electronic control panels, programmable logical control devices, communication interfaces with color touch screens, electronic limit switches and all electronic sensors required to control the aforesaid manure management equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Manure management systems for dairy farms consisting primarily of electronic control panels, programmable logical control devices, communication interfaces with color touch screens, electronic limit switches and all electronic sensors required to control manure management machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |