Drawing for VEGAN MILK

USPTO serial 97633731

VEGAN MILK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEGAN MILK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Dixon

Jeffrey S. Dixon Law Offices of Konrad Sherinian, LLC1755 Park St Ste 200Naperville, IL 60563UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated, non-veterinary vegan grooming preparations in the nature of pet shampoo and conditionerACTIVEDec 1, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2023GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2023GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2023EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Aug 7, 2023CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance