USPTO serial 97638928
METROLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBIN, DAVID I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METROLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oxbow, Saskatchewan, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Davis
Anthony J. Davis OGC Solutions LLP1 Gatehall Drive, Suite 100Parsippany, NJ 07054United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mobile diesel generators, namely, diesel operated power generators; power generators being gas, diesel and electric generators; electric generators; solar and battery powered generators, namely, electricity generators | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Mobile diesel light towers being mobile light towers; hybrid diesel light tower being solar, diesel, and battery operated, namely, mobile light towers; electric light tower, namely, mobile light towers; mobile light towers; mobile light towers powered by electricity, solar, battery, diesel, and a combination of electricity, solar, battery or diesel; heaters used for commercial, construction, mining, petrochemical and industrial applications being portable electric heaters and diesel, natural gas and propane fired heaters | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | online retail store, retail store, retail, and wholesale store services all featuring mobile diesel generators, power generators being gas, diesel and electric generators, electrical generators, solar and battery powered generators, mobile diesel light towers, mobile light towers, hybrid diesel light towers powered by solar, diesel, and battery pack, electric light tower, namely mobile light towers, mobile light towers powered by electricity, solar, battery, diesel and a combination of electricity, solar, battery or diesel, heaters used for commercial, construction, mining, petrochemical and industrial applications being electric heaters and diesel heaters, natural gas and propane fired heaters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |