Drawing for TOPCOOL

USPTO serial 97648493

TOPCOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOPCOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mona Kesar

2819 LOVELAND ST.NAPERVILLE, IL 60564UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Industrial electric oscillating fans for automatic cleaning of ceilings, light fixtures, ducts and other overhead structures exposed to fibrous airborne contaminants; Ventilating exhaust fans; Ventilating exhaust fans for dairy, swine, and poultry farm; Ventilating fans for commercial and industrial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2024PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 20, 2023PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 19, 2023APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 28, 2023PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2023ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Nov 27, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2022MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance