USPTO serial 97662712
THE CONTRACT NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CONTRACT NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen P. Meleen
Stephen P. Meleen PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 EAST 6TH STREET, SUITE 300AUSTIN, TX 78702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting, management, and planning services for others in the field of business arrangements, negotiations, or deals; Providing a website featuring an online marketplace for attorneys and people seeking legal services; Operating an online marketplace connecting attorneys and people seeking legal services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for managing, reviewing, drafting, editing, collaborating, and negotiating contracts; Providing online non-downloadable software for tracking user data in the field of contract formation; Providing online non-downloadable software for matching user profile preferences in the field of contract formation; Providing online non-downloadable software for providing information about contracts; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for managing, reviewing, drafting, editing, collaborating, and negotiating contracts; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for tracking user data and preferences in the field of contract formation; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for matching user profile preferences in the field of contract formation; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for providing information about contracts; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for managing, reviewing, drafting, editing, collaborating, and negotiating contracts; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for tracking user data and preferences in the field of contract formation; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for matching user profile preferences in the field of contract formation; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for providing information about contracts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |