Drawing for DOG CITY

USPTO serial 97664979

DOG CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOZEAU, BRANDON THOMAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOG CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan J. Kohlmann

Susan J. Kohlmann JENNER & BLOCK LLP1155 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital media, namely, digital collectibles in the nature of downloadable multimedia files containing representations of dog boarding, dog walking and dog grooming services authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); downloadable and recorded computer software for issuing non-fungible tokens (NFTs), digital tokens for use in virtual environmentsACTIVE—
035Retail store featuring virtual goods, namely, shirts, hats, jewelry, clothing, tote bags, stationery, cups, mugs, bottles, and toys for use in virtual environments; Online retail store services featuring virtual goods, namely, shirts, hats, jewelry, clothing, tote bags, stationery, cups, mugs, bottles, and toys for use in virtual environmentsACTIVE—
045Concierge services for others comprised of making requested personal arrangements, errands and reservations in virtual environments and the metaverse; and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needs rendered together in an apartment complex in virtual environments and the metaverseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2024XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2024GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2024GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2024CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 3, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance