USPTO serial 97676251
GENIUS TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 807Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNING, KATHRYN ELISABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with GENIUS TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rahway, NJ, US
Rahway, NJ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Abadi
3 Park Avenue, Suite 3102ANEW YORK, NY 10016United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric charging cables; cellphone auxiliary cables; USB cables; wireless chargers; battery chargers for mobile phones, tablet computers, and laptops; portable battery chargers; Recorded and downloadable software for controlling automobiles, robots, computers, and consumer electronic devices, downloadable and recorded software as a component of personal computers; downloadable software for TVs, computers and automobiles; home audio speakers; portable audio speakers; sound bars; gaming accessories, namely, wireless controllers, wireless communication devices for voice, data or image transmission, wireless headsets for smartphones or tablet computers or electronic games, wireless computer keyboards; joysticks for use with computers, other than for video games; eyewear featuring speakers; virtual reality headsets; headphones; earbuds; smart home accessories, namely, cameras, electric locks, light switches, adapter plugs; tablet computers; electronic book readers; computers; laptops; document printers; video projectors; computer monitors; computer hardware, namely, wireless network extenders; smartwatches; digital photo frames; GPS receivers; GPS navigation devices; GPS tracking devices; digital weather station instruments; telescopes; microscopes; car audio speakers; car stereos; karaoke machines; anti-blue light eyewear; sound recording and playback machines; baby monitors; bathroom scales; teaching robots; security surveillance robots | ACTIVE | May 15, 2026 |
| 028 | Educational toys for the purpose of developing science, technology, engineering, and math skills; exercise machines; baby swings; Electronic toys, namely, remote control cars and drones; pet toys; video game joysticks; computer game joysticks | ACTIVE | May 15, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |