USPTO serial 97678422
CLOUD CONNECT SUMMIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFITHS, SYDNEY V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLOUD CONNECT SUMMIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett M. Hutton
5 COLUMBIA CIRCLEALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of network security; Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of cloud collaboration; Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of cybersecurity; Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of cloud computing; Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of cloud security; Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of ransomware; Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of cloud storage; Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of cloud connectivity; Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of telecommunications technology; Arranging and conducting seminars, workshops, educational exhibitions, conferences, events for educational purposes, lectures, teleseminars, training and classes in the field of internet of things (loT) | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |