Drawing for WINDFARM

USPTO serial 97679714

WINDFARM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WINDFARM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott M. Douglass

Scott M. Douglass BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC165 MADISON AVENUE, SUITE 2000MEMPHIS, TN 38103United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030(Based on Use in Commerce) Caffeine-free coffee; Coffee; Coffee and tea; Coffee beans; Ground coffee beans; Iced coffee; Prepared coffee and coffee-based beveragesACTIVEJan 1, 2010
043(Based on Intent to Use) Coffee and juice bar services; Coffee and tea bars; Coffee bars; Coffee shops; Coffee-house and snack-bar servicesACTIVE—
045(Based on Intent to Use) Conducting religious prayer services; Providing a website featuring information about religious belief systems; Religious and spiritual services, namely, conducting religious worship, marriage ceremonies, baptismal ceremonies, baby dedications, bereavement ceremonies, and religious counseling; Religious and spiritual services, namely, providing gatherings and retreats to develop and enhance the spiritual lives of individuals; Religious services, namely, prayer meetingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2024EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 7, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance