USPTO serial 97682218
MIGHTY PAW WAGGABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TARASCIO, MAUREEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIGHTY PAW WAGGABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TODD R. MILLER
TODD R. MILLER VESTED LAW LLP221 E. WALNUT STREET, SUITE 227PASADENA, CA 91101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Animal feed additives for use as nutritional supplements; nutritional supplements for animals; vitamins and food additives in the nature of dietary food supplements for animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |