USPTO serial 97683999
META GAMING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with META GAMING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Menlo Park, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Malutta
Anthony J. Malutta KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 1900SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Photo sharing and video sharing services, namely, electronic transmission of digital photo files, videos and audio visual content among internet users; Telecommunications services; Providing access to computer, electronic and online databases; Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of data, messages, graphics, images, audio, video and information; Providing online forums for communication on topics of general interest; Providing online communications links which transfer internet users to other local and global online locations; Providing internet access to third party websites or to other electronic third party content via a universal login; Providing online chat rooms for social networking, instant messaging services, and electronic bulletin boards; Audio, text message and video broadcasting services over the internet or other communication networks; Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services; Peer-to-peer photo and data sharing services, namely, electronic transmission of digital photo and video files, graphics and audio content among internet users; Telecommunications and peer-to-peer network computer services, namely, electronic transmission of images, audio-visual and video content, photographs, videos, data, text, messages, advertisements, media advertising communications and information; Streaming and live streaming of video, audiovisual, and interactive audiovisual content via the internet; Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of virtual and augmented reality content and data; Providing electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; Video conferencing services; Audio and video teleconferencing services; Providing an online community forum for users to share and stream information, audio, video, real-time news, entertainment content, or information, to form virtual communities, and to engage in social networking; Electronic transmission of voice, data, audio, video, text and graphics via the internet and telecommunications networks; Streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network; Streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual gaming content via a global computer network; Electronic transmission and streaming of digital media content for others via global and local computer networks; Electronic transmission and streaming of gaming digital media content for others via global and local computer networks; Streaming of audio material on the internet; Streaming of video material on the internet; Streaming of data; Video broadcasting; Audio broadcasting; transmission and delivery of video and audio via wireless communication; Live streaming of gaming content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |