USPTO serial 97684368
KONQUER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REID, MONICA R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KONQUER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard H Newman
Richard H Newman Newman Law, LLC7435 S Eastern Ave Ste 105-431Las Vegas, NV 89123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Online gaming services in the nature of Betting services; Wagering services; Providing online betting and wagering services; Entertainment services in the nature of casino gaming; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable wagering games; Entertainment services in the nature of providing wagering games; Casino gaming offered via mobile telecommunication services; Wagering games offered via mobile telecommunication services; Entertainment services, namely providing online wagering games; Entertainment services, namely providing online casino gaming; Entertainment services, namely, providing games of chance via the Internet; Entertainment services, namely providing casino gaming via the Internet; Entertainment services, namely providing wagering games via the Internet; Providing entertainment information in the fields of casino gaming and wagering games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |