USPTO serial 97687110
D DISG TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALES, HEATHER ALISON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D DISG TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
YU HAO YAO
YU HAO YAO TIANYU LAW GROUP, INC.9660 FLAIR DR, STE 328EL MONTE, CA 91731UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Loudspeakers; Subwoofers; Audio electronic components, namely, surround sound systems; Audio transmitter units; Audio- and video-receivers; Cabinets for loudspeakers; Charging appliances for rechargeable equipment; Horns for loudspeakers; Portable media players; Signal processors for audio speakers; Speaker enclosures; Wireless chargers; Wireless speakers | ABANDONED | Oct 6, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |