USPTO serial 97688514
INFOBRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OAKES, ANNA JENNIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFOBRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jonkoping, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer A. Van Kirk
JENNIFER A. VAN KIRK LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP201 EAST WASHINGTON STREETPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; supervision and surveillance programmes (computer programs); interactive computer programmes and interactive computer systems for communication, control identification and personnel management; data-processing equipment and computers; security and access control apparatus and instruments; encoded passes; chip cards and multi-function chip cards; RFID transponders and memories; card readers; electric monitoring apparatus and instruments for ascertaining and indicating motion and position; telecommunications equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management; business administration; management assistance; professional business consultations; business research; human resource administration; human resources management; compilation, systematisation and input of information in databases; database management; data storage; computerised file management also provided via the Internet, intranets and global computer networks; data-processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, installation, maintenance, updating of computer software, computer hardware; consultancy and information relating to computer software and computer hardware; technical support, maintenance and updating services (computer software and hardware); computer programming; computer systems design; computer software rental; installation and integration of computer systems, computer hardware and computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security services for the protection of property; surveillance services; anti-theft property marking and tracking services; security services using electronic information, signature and encryption processes; consultancy, Information and advise with regard to security and anti-theft matters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |