USPTO serial 97689528
WATERDROP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATERDROP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brittany L. Kulwicki
Brittany L. Kulwicki Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP1405 E 6th StThe Calfee BuildingCleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical leak detection hardware and recorded operating software sold as a unit; Electrical leak detection hardware with embedded operating system software; Infrared detectors; Life jackets; batteries; Electronic tags for goods; pedometers; apparatus for testing machines that stamp mail; cash registers; Mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; downloadable computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; electronic terminal for an electronic lottery system which generates lottery tickets; downloadable pattern recognition software for identifying human faces; Digital colour copiers; Scales; Measuring rulers; Rotating lights; Aerials; Microphones; Distance measuring apparatus; Laboratory robots; dynamometers; satellites for scientific purposes; binoculars; Polycrystalline silicon photovoltaic cells; Polycrystalline silicon solar cells; integrated circuits; Electrical conductors; Electric switches; video screens; remote controls for televisions; optical filters; Automated digital controls for power stations; Automated process control system comprised of logic based hardware to monitor the status of power stations; lightning conductors; ionization apparatus for scientific or laboratory use and not for the treatment of air or water; fire-extinguishers; Protective helmets; anti-theft locks specially adapted to personal electronic devices, namely, cell phones and computers; Theft alarms, electric; eyeglasses; Video disks with recorded animated cartoons; electronic collars to train animals; Water testing instrumentation for monitoring and detecting contamination; Pressure control equipment, namely, blowout preventers for water filters; Pressure controllers for controlling the pressure of liquid in water filters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |