Drawing for SAGA MULTIVERSE

USPTO serial 97696905

SAGA MULTIVERSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAGA MULTIVERSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip Nulud

Philip Nulud BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1000 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Cryptocurrency exchange services; Cryptocurrency trading services; Cryptocurrency exchange services featuring blockchain technology; Financial consultation in the field of cryptocurrency; Issuance of tokens of value; Providing financial information in the field of cryptocurrencyACTIVE—
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use for building and deploying blockchain-based applications, including games, NFTs, DeFi and other financial services; Cloud computing featuring software for use in blockchain-based applications, including games, NFTs, DeFi and other financial services; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting software for blockchain-based applications, including games, NFTs, DeFi and other financial services for use by others; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for blockchain-based applications, including games, NFTs, DeFi and other financial services; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for blockchain-based applications, including games, NFTs, DeFi and other financial servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 19, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 19, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 18, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 1, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance