USPTO serial 97698960
HONORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HONORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nashville, TN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott M. Douglass
Scott M. Douglass BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC165 MADISON AVENUE, SUITE 2000MEMPHIS, TN 38103United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Luggage and carrying bags; sports bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Insulated containers for beverage cans; insulated food and drink containers; thermal insulated drink holders and sleeves; beverageware, namely, cups, temperature-retaining drinking vessels, stainless steel tumblers for use as drinking vessels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Golf bags; golf gloves; golf clubs; golf tees | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | PMSD | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - DENIED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |