USPTO serial 97702525
THE HARVEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRUSSMAN, IAN GEORGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE HARVEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Olivia M. Clavio
Olivia M. Clavio TYZ LAW GROUP PC4 EMBARCADERO CENTER, FLOOR 14SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable computer game software; downloadable electronic game software for use on wireless devices, handheld computers, and tablet computers; downloadable interactive multimedia computer game programs; downloadable multiplayer online battle arena computer game software; downloadable multiplayer online battle arena game software for use with personal computers, home video game consoles and arcade-based video game consoles; downloadable player versus player (PvP) video game software; downloadable multiplayer online battle arena mobile game software; downloadable single-player player versus environment (PvE) video game software; downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; downloadable computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles; downloadable interactive game software; downloadable software for providing access to an online multimedia virtual environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games, video games, and online multiplayer video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online multiplayer video games; Providing an online environment for users to play online computer games and electronic games, namely, providing a website featuring online computer games and electronic games for users to play; Providing games for use network-wide by network users; Providing interactive, multiplayer and single player online games played via computer, mobile device, or communications networks; Providing online computer, video, and electronic games from a computer network; multimedia publishing of games; Arranging and conducting competitions and social entertainment events for players of video, computer, electronic or interactive multimedia games; entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games, video games, and online multiplayer video games featuring in-game virtual currency, tokens, and currency | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by InVert Cayman
- Other trademarks owned by Falco Cayman
- Other trademarks owned by Falco Cayman
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE HARVEST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |