USPTO serial 97704458
SEESNAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUILICI, BRENDAN A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEESNAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Tietsworth
Steven C. Tietsworth SEESCAN, INC.3855 RUFFIN ROADSTEVEN C. TIETSWORTH, GENERAL COUNSELSAN DIEGO, CA 92123Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Parts for video inspection systems, namely, Power adapters, cable guide assemblies, camera assemblies, camera heads, cable drums, flexmitters, slip rings, circuit boards, interconnect cables, electrical cords and cables, electronic keypads, compression bushings, electrical connectors, electronic components, battery assemblies, bearings for video camera systems, pipe guides for video camera systems, springs for video camera system push-cables, push-cables for video camera systems, speakers, cable counters for video camera systems, video camera systems frames, electrical termination kits, labels for video camera systems, hardware for video camera systems, drums for video camera systems, axle assemblies for video camera systems, kickstands for video camera systems, drum assembly parts for video camera systems, LCD displays, battery electronic circuits, cover assemblies for video camera systems, fan assemblies for video camera systems, camera control unit (CCU) troubleshooting kits for video camera systems, power adapters for video camera systems, cable guide mechanical components for video camera systems, hub components for video camera systems, electrical interconnectors for video camera systems, pipe guide components for video camera systems, slide latch assemblies for video camera systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |