Drawing for POCKETLAW

USPTO serial 97711203

POCKETLAW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMILLAN, CHRISTOPHER J
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with POCKETLAW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CLIFF KUEHN

CLIFF KUEHN PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 EAST 6TH STREET, SUITE 300AUSTIN, TX 78702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer programs for automation of document drafting, inter-organization messaging, provision of e-signature services, provision of legal advice and information, and storage and management of legal data of an organization; Downloadable computer programs for processing data; Downloadable application programming interface (API) software; Downloadable programs for computers for automation of document drafting, inter-organization messaging, provision of e-signature services, provision of legal advice and information, and storage and management of legal data of an organizationABANDONED—
035Business administrationABANDONED—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for automation of document drafting, inter-organization messaging, provision of e-signature services, provision of legal advice and information, and storage and management of legal data of an organization; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software for replying to questions from internal employees and external clients related to document drafting, provision of e-signature services, provision of legal advice and information, and storage and management of legal data of an organizationABANDONED—
045Information, advisory and consultancy services relating to legal matters; Legal adviceABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2025MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 18, 2025ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 18, 2025OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2025OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 11, 2025PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Mar 10, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 7, 2025OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 7, 2025OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 28, 2025TPADTEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2023LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 14, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2023LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jan 7, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance