Drawing for GOLDLAND

USPTO serial 97711759

GOLDLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 651
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jin J. Kim

Jin J. Kim ACI LAW GROUP, PC6 CENTERPOINTE DRSTE 630LA PALMA, CA 90623

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028educational toys in the nature of toys made of cardboard for assembly; educational toys for children in the nature of toys made of cardboard for assembly; electronic educational game machines for children; robotic toys for assembly and coding; toy models made of cardboard for assembly; toys, namely, cardboard toys, cardboard block toys, cardboard robot toys, cardboard toy figures, automata kits, cardboard roller coaster toys, cardboard car toys, and cardboard DIY kitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 12, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 17, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 16, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 15, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 3, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2024ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 12, 2024GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2024GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2024CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 8, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 8, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance