USPTO serial 97713579
INFRALESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFRALESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Golenson
Michael S. Golenson MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MITCHELL, LTD.203 N. LASALLE STREETSUITE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software development; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for creation and use of application programming interface (API) software; application service provider for creation and use of application programming interface (API) software; providing online, non-downloadable software for composition, compilation, and execution of application programming interface (API) software; creating, providing, and maintaining a hosting platform for sharing application programming interface (API) software online; development of individually developed software to connect various computer programs and services; development and maintenance of open source software; technical support services, namely, software development support in the nature of computer diagnostic services and troubleshooting of computer software problems; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for connecting and integrating software or services; Platform as a Service (PaaS) services featuring a suite of computer software for integrating, deploying and using software or services; cloud storage services for electronic data; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable application programming interface (API) software; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software for integrating application programming interfaces (API) and their data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |