USPTO serial 97719531
LOUD LEAF BY KALIBLOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAYABYAB, EDWARD TAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOUD LEAF BY KALIBLOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Billerica, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack Fritz
Jack Fritz Fritz Law Group | Patent Jack PLC401 W A St Suite 200Fritz Law Group | Patent Jack Prof CorpSan Diego, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Cigar Tobacco Leafs; Smoke in the nature of cigar wraps; Blunt in the nature of cannabis wraps; Cigarette rolling papers made of hemp; Hemp rolling paper wraps for smoking hemp; Rolling paper wraps containing hemp for smoking hemp Hemp based rolling paper wraps for smoking hemp; Pre-rolled smoking cigar tubes made of hemp-based paper; Cigar wraps made from hemp; Cigarette papers made from hemp; Leaf tobacco; Cigar wraps; Cigarette papers; Hookah tobacco; Vapor pens being electronic oral vaporizers sold empty for smoking purposes; Electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty; Electronic cigarettes; Cartomizers, namely, combination electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty and atomizers, sold as a component of electronic cigarettes; Flavorings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; Mechanical electronic cigarettes; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of propylene glycol, other than essential oils; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of vegetable glycerin, other than essential oils; Electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers sold empty for smokers; Electronic cigarettes for use as an alternative to traditional cigarettes; Liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes, other than essential oils; Components for electric and electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers for smokers, namely, atomizers, cartomizers in the nature of combination electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty and atomizers all sold as a component of electronic cigarettes, and clearomizers sold empty for tobacco substitutes in the nature of combination electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty and atomizers all sold as a component of electronic cigarettes; Herbs for smoking, namely, hemp flowers with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Pre-packaged dried CBD hemp flower in the nature of herbs for smoking containing CBD derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis for smoking purposes; hemp derivatives, derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, namely, resins and electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of propylene glycol also containing hemp oils, other than essential oils, hashes and waxes for smoking or and vaping; none of the foregoing containing or for use with cannabis with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; any hemp and CBD in the foregoing goods are derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |