Drawing for AMG

USPTO serial 97723628

AMG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BARQUET-HORNBACK, ELENA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia W. Stangle

Claudia W. Stangle LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric household and kitchen machines and equipment, namely, electric food choppers, and electric coffee grindersACTIVE—
011Water heaters, namely, electric kettles; electric tea pots and coffee machines; electric espresso machines; fully automatic electric coffee machines; electric coffee machines, namely, electric coffee presses; structural parts for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Feb 9, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 4, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 17, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 22, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2023MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance